A web portal that archives polar expedition reports, datasets, publications, and media, while generating content for websites and social media.
Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES) · National Centre for Polar andOcean Research (NCPOR) · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team, so everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Knowledge Repository
An archive system for storing expedition reports, scientific datasets, publications, photographs, and videos.
Activity Tracker
A module to log and display institutional activities.
Content Generator
A tool that generates content for websites and social media platforms from the archived materials.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The jury will evaluate how well the portal organizes and archives diverse media types, and whether the content generation feature works smoothly for websites and social media.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules, never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
What specific social media platforms must be integrated?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
What file formats and storage limits the repository requires?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
The brief asks for knowledge repository. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26063 itself: An archive system for storing expedition reports, scientific datasets, publications, photographs, and videos. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for activity tracker. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26063 itself: A module to log and display institutional activities. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for content generator. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26063 itself: A tool that generates content for websites and social media platforms from the archived materials. The brief asks for it by name.
Where does your data come from: a published source, one you collect, or one you generate?
No dataset is attached to this problem statement, so sourcing it is part of the work and nobody told you that.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the jury will evaluate how well the portal organizes and archives diverse media types, and whether the content generation feature works smoothly for websites and social media.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.
Each one is quoted from a gap in the brief, not a guess about your team.
No measurable target
The text provides no quantitative performance or capacity targets.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.