A digital twin software platform that lets researchers monitor infrastructure, energy, logistics, and environmental data for the Maitri and Bharati Antarctic stations remotely.
Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES) · National Centre for Polar andOcean Research (NCPOR) · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team — everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Infrastructure Module
Tracks the status and condition of station buildings and physical assets.
Energy Management Module
Monitors power usage and energy generation systems across the research stations.
Logistics Tracker
Manages supply chains, transport, and inventory operations for remote management.
Environmental Monitoring
Collects and displays sensor data related to the surrounding Antarctic environment.
Digital Twin Dashboard
Integrates all data streams into a unified interface for remote operators.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules — never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
The brief asks for infrastructure module. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26060 itself — Tracks the status and condition of station buildings and physical assets. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for energy management module. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26060 itself — Monitors power usage and energy generation systems across the research stations. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for logistics tracker. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26060 itself — Manages supply chains, transport, and inventory operations for remote management. The brief asks for it by name.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.
Pick what you are about to do and copy the prompt. It carries the organisers' own wording, the constraints they never spell out, and an instruction not to invent requirements they never set.
Who has this problem, what already exists, and what you would have to find out.
The official description is only 172 characters, so we have held back the evaluator read and the risk flags rather than guess at them.
The brief asks for environmental monitoring. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26060 itself — Collects and displays sensor data related to the surrounding Antarctic environment. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for digital twin dashboard. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26060 itself — Integrates all data streams into a unified interface for remote operators. The brief asks for it by name.
Where does your data come from — a published source, one you collect, or one you generate?
No dataset is attached to this problem statement, so sourcing it is part of the work and nobody told you that.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.