An AI system that processes underwater sonar images to automatically detect man-made debris and output a location report for marine operators.
Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES) · National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT) · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team — everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Object Detection Model
An artificial intelligence model trained to locate man-made debris and structures in sonar images.
Noise Filtering Module
A pre-processing filter that removes false positives from natural rock clusters and acoustic shadows.
Reporting and Geotagging Engine
A script that reads sonar metadata and outputs structured reports in JSON or CSV format with location details.
UI Dashboard
A visual interface where users can upload sonar logs, view detections overlaid on a map, and download reports.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The evaluators will check if your AI model can handle high speckle noise and acoustic shadows, successfully filter out natural rock formations, output confidence scores, and generate structured location reports with a working user interface dashboard.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules — never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
Labeled side-scan sonar training dataset?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Exact sonar metadata format or coordinate file structure?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
The brief asks for object detection model. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26057 itself — An artificial intelligence model trained to locate man-made debris and structures in sonar images. The brief asks for it by name.
Each one is quoted from a gap in the brief, not a guess about your team.
Needs data you may not get
The text requires training an AI model on side-scan sonar imagery to detect specific debris, but the organisers are not providing a dataset.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.
Pick what you are about to do and copy the prompt. It carries the organisers' own wording, the constraints they never spell out, and an instruction not to invent requirements they never set.
Who has this problem, what already exists, and what you would have to find out.
The brief asks for noise filtering module. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26057 itself — A pre-processing filter that removes false positives from natural rock clusters and acoustic shadows. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for reporting and geotagging engine. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26057 itself — A script that reads sonar metadata and outputs structured reports in JSON or CSV format with location details. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for ui dashboard. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26057 itself — A visual interface where users can upload sonar logs, view detections overlaid on a map, and download reports. The brief asks for it by name.
Where does your data come from — a published source, one you collect, or one you generate?
No dataset is attached to this problem statement, so sourcing it is part of the work and nobody told you that.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the evaluators will check if your AI model can handle high speckle noise and acoustic shadows, successfully filter out natural rock formations, output confidence scores, and generate structured location reports with a working user interface dashboard.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.