A secure digital document management system that lets law enforcement and legal institutions store, search, and share sensitive case documents.
Ministry of Home Affairs · National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), Women Safety Division · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team — everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Document Storage
Digitizes and centralizes police reports, court filings, and evidence records.
Access Control
Manages permissions to ensure confidentiality and secure sharing for authorized users.
Audit Trail
Maintains a complete record of document activities and prevents unauthorized modifications.
Search and Retrieval
Enables efficient searching and quick retrieval of legal documents.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The jury will check whether the system securely stores documents, prevents tampering, maintains an audit trail, and provides controlled access for authorized users.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules — never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
What specific legal and regulatory compliance standards must be met?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
What specific cloud or blockchain technologies are required?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
The brief asks for document storage. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26190 itself — Digitizes and centralizes police reports, court filings, and evidence records. The brief asks for it by name.
Each one is quoted from a gap in the brief, not a guess about your team.
No measurable target
The description does not provide any measurable performance, search speed, or security targets.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.
Pick what you are about to do and copy the prompt. It carries the organisers' own wording, the constraints they never spell out, and an instruction not to invent requirements they never set.
Who has this problem, what already exists, and what you would have to find out.
The brief asks for access control. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26190 itself — Manages permissions to ensure confidentiality and secure sharing for authorized users. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for audit trail. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26190 itself — Maintains a complete record of document activities and prevents unauthorized modifications. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for search and retrieval. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26190 itself — Enables efficient searching and quick retrieval of legal documents. The brief asks for it by name.
Where does your data come from — a published source, one you collect, or one you generate?
No dataset is attached to this problem statement, so sourcing it is part of the work and nobody told you that.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the jury will check whether the system securely stores documents, prevents tampering, maintains an audit trail, and provides controlled access for authorized users.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.