A software platform that uses artificial intelligence and HR data to predict stress levels in uniformed personnel, providing a mobile app for self-assessment and a dashboard for commanders.
Ministry of Home Affairs · Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Police II Division · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team — everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Wellness Monitoring Dashboard
A web dashboard for commanders and welfare officers to view stress risk assessments and welfare recommendations.
Mobile Assessment App
A mobile application that allows personnel to complete voluntary wellness assessments and self-reporting.
Predictive Analytics Engine
An AI engine that analyzes HR metrics, deployment history, and behavioral patterns to detect stress risks.
Intervention Recommendation System
A module that suggests proactive counseling, workload balancing, and welfare measures.
Privacy and Security Framework
A system implementing role-based access control, data anonymization, and secure storage.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The jury will test how well the system protects user privacy, enforces role-based access control, and handles sensitive psychological data securely without leading to disciplinary stigmatization.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules — never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
Specific machine learning algorithms or frameworks to use?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Exact HRMS database schemas for integration?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
The specific clinical scales or questionnaires required for self-assessment?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.
Pick what you are about to do and copy the prompt. It carries the organisers' own wording, the constraints they never spell out, and an instruction not to invent requirements they never set.
Who has this problem, what already exists, and what you would have to find out.
The brief asks for wellness monitoring dashboard. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26186 itself — A web dashboard for commanders and welfare officers to view stress risk assessments and welfare recommendations. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for mobile assessment app. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26186 itself — A mobile application that allows personnel to complete voluntary wellness assessments and self-reporting. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for predictive analytics engine. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26186 itself — An AI engine that analyzes HR metrics, deployment history, and behavioral patterns to detect stress risks. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for intervention recommendation system. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26186 itself — A module that suggests proactive counseling, workload balancing, and welfare measures. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for privacy and security framework. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26186 itself — A system implementing role-based access control, data anonymization, and secure storage. The brief asks for it by name.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the jury will test how well the system protects user privacy, enforces role-based access control, and handles sensitive psychological data securely without leading to disciplinary stigmatization.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.