An AI-powered document screening platform for border security personnel that extracts text, validates documents, detects tampering, and verifies faces.
Ministry of Home Affairs · Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB), Police II Division · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team — everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
OCR Extraction Module
Automatically extract information from passports, visas, national IDs, driving licenses, and permits.
Document Validation Module
Verify whether the extracted information follows official document standards.
Tampering Detection Module
Detect digitally or physically altered documents including photo replacements, text manipulation, and forged stamps.
Face Verification Module
Ensure the document owner matches the presented individual.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The jury will check whether your platform accurately extracts text, detects various types of document tampering, and successfully matches faces to verify identity.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules — never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
Specific databases to integrate with for validation?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Exact risk scoring formula or thresholds?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
The brief asks for ocr extraction module. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26188 itself — Automatically extract information from passports, visas, national IDs, driving licenses, and permits. The brief asks for it by name.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.
Pick what you are about to do and copy the prompt. It carries the organisers' own wording, the constraints they never spell out, and an instruction not to invent requirements they never set.
Who has this problem, what already exists, and what you would have to find out.
The brief asks for document validation module. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26188 itself — Verify whether the extracted information follows official document standards. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for tampering detection module. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26188 itself — Detect digitally or physically altered documents including photo replacements, text manipulation, and forged stamps. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for face verification module. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26188 itself — Ensure the document owner matches the presented individual. The brief asks for it by name.
Where does your data come from — a published source, one you collect, or one you generate?
No dataset is attached to this problem statement, so sourcing it is part of the work and nobody told you that.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the jury will check whether your platform accurately extracts text, detects various types of document tampering, and successfully matches faces to verify identity.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.