Build an AI-enabled system that takes a single drone video with GPS and metadata to generate a georeferenced, metrically accurate textured 3D model.
National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO) · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team — everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Video Ingestion Module
Takes the mandatory 1080p or 4K drone video, GPS coordinates, and flight metadata as inputs.
Frame Processing Engine
Handles motion blur, video compression artifacts, and variable illumination across video frames.
3D Reconstruction Pipeline
Reconstructs terrain, structures, building facades, roads, vegetation, and dynamic objects from limited viewing angles.
Georeferencing and Metric Scaling
Applies GPS data and sensor inputs to ensure the final model maintains metric accuracy without extensive ground control points.
3D Model Export
Outputs textured 3D meshes or point clouds suitable for visualization, measurement, and analysis.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The evaluators will check if the system can successfully generate a georeferenced, metrically accurate 3D model using only a single drone pass video while handling challenges like motion blur, dynamic objects, and limited viewing angles.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules — never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
Exact metric accuracy tolerance thresholds?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Maximum processing time limit for near real-time?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Specific output file format requirements?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
Each one is quoted from a gap in the brief, not a guess about your team.
No measurable target
The description asks for metrically accurate 3D models but never defines a specific numerical error margin or tolerance threshold for success.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.
Pick what you are about to do and copy the prompt. It carries the organisers' own wording, the constraints they never spell out, and an instruction not to invent requirements they never set.
Who has this problem, what already exists, and what you would have to find out.
The brief asks for video ingestion module. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26158 itself — Takes the mandatory 1080p or 4K drone video, GPS coordinates, and flight metadata as inputs. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for frame processing engine. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26158 itself — Handles motion blur, video compression artifacts, and variable illumination across video frames. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for 3d reconstruction pipeline. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26158 itself — Reconstructs terrain, structures, building facades, roads, vegetation, and dynamic objects from limited viewing angles. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for georeferencing and metric scaling. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26158 itself — Applies GPS data and sensor inputs to ensure the final model maintains metric accuracy without extensive ground control points. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for 3d model export. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26158 itself — Outputs textured 3D meshes or point clouds suitable for visualization, measurement, and analysis. The brief asks for it by name.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the evaluators will check if the system can successfully generate a georeferenced, metrically accurate 3D model using only a single drone pass video while handling challenges like motion blur, dynamic objects, and limited viewing angles.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.