A GUI-based software tool that takes .IQ or .wav files as input, extracts signal parameters, and performs demodulation, de-interleaving, and error correction.
National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO) · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team — everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
File Input Interface
A graphical user interface to upload and ingest .IQ or .wav signal data files.
Parameter Extraction
An automated analysis module to identify sampling frequency, modulation type, FEC, and interleaving.
Demodulation Engine
A module to demodulate signals including FSK, QAM, and PSK.
De-interleaving and FEC
A module to carry out de-interleaving and forward error correction like Viterbi decoding and RS block codes.
Bit Stream Correlation
A component to perform bit stream correlation for identifying header and payload data.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The evaluators will check if the GUI can successfully take .IQ and .wav inputs, display spectral features like constellation plots and waterfall diagrams, and correctly perform parameter extraction, demodulation, de-interleaving, and FEC.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules — never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
Sample dataset files for training and testing?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Specific performance or accuracy targets?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
The brief asks for file input interface. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26147 itself — A graphical user interface to upload and ingest .IQ or .wav signal data files. The brief asks for it by name.
Each one is quoted from a gap in the brief, not a guess about your team.
No dataset provided
The description depends on real data, and the organisers have not attached a dataset link.
Needs data you may not get
The text mentions spectral relationship from training data containing both .IQ and .wav formats, which students may not possess.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.
Pick what you are about to do and copy the prompt. It carries the organisers' own wording, the constraints they never spell out, and an instruction not to invent requirements they never set.
Who has this problem, what already exists, and what you would have to find out.
The brief asks for parameter extraction. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26147 itself — An automated analysis module to identify sampling frequency, modulation type, FEC, and interleaving. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for demodulation engine. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26147 itself — A module to demodulate signals including FSK, QAM, and PSK. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for de-interleaving and fec. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26147 itself — A module to carry out de-interleaving and forward error correction like Viterbi decoding and RS block codes. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for bit stream correlation. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26147 itself — A component to perform bit stream correlation for identifying header and payload data. The brief asks for it by name.
Where does your data come from — a published source, one you collect, or one you generate?
No dataset is attached to this problem statement, so sourcing it is part of the work and nobody told you that.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the evaluators will check if the GUI can successfully take .IQ and .wav inputs, display spectral features like constellation plots and waterfall diagrams, and correctly perform parameter extraction, demodulation, de-interleaving, and FEC.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.