A web and mobile system that tracks employment outcomes, wages, and skill gaps for trainees using consent-based records and automated follow-ups.
Government Of Maharashtra · Maharashtra State Innovation Society, Department of Skills, Employment, Entrepreneurship and Innovation · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team — everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Consent-Based Records
Create trainee profiles that capture enrolment details and collect consent for tracking.
Employment Linkage Module
Link training records with placement data, job retention markers, and wage progression.
Automated Follow-Up Tool
Conduct automated and assisted follow-ups to track phone number or location changes.
Validation and Analytics
Validate employer information and generate analytics for cohorts, courses, and providers.
Skill Gap Analyzer
Identify specific skill gaps and reasons for non-placement or attrition.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The evaluators will check if your system uses consent-based tracking, handles automated follow-ups despite changed phone numbers, and provides analytics across districts and cohorts.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules — never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
What specific integration methods or existing databases the system must connect with?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
What exact privacy standards or frameworks must be followed for consent?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
The brief asks for consent-based records. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26135 itself — Create trainee profiles that capture enrolment details and collect consent for tracking. The brief asks for it by name.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.
Pick what you are about to do and copy the prompt. It carries the organisers' own wording, the constraints they never spell out, and an instruction not to invent requirements they never set.
Who has this problem, what already exists, and what you would have to find out.
The brief asks for employment linkage module. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26135 itself — Link training records with placement data, job retention markers, and wage progression. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for automated follow-up tool. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26135 itself — Conduct automated and assisted follow-ups to track phone number or location changes. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for validation and analytics. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26135 itself — Validate employer information and generate analytics for cohorts, courses, and providers. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for skill gap analyzer. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26135 itself — Identify specific skill gaps and reasons for non-placement or attrition. The brief asks for it by name.
Where does your data come from — a published source, one you collect, or one you generate?
No dataset is attached to this problem statement, so sourcing it is part of the work and nobody told you that.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the evaluators will check if your system uses consent-based tracking, handles automated follow-ups despite changed phone numbers, and provides analytics across districts and cohorts.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.