A web platform that lets entrepreneurs track industrial approvals, check required documents, and access government support schemes through a single dashboard.
Government Of Maharashtra · Maharashtra State Innovation Society, Department of Skills, Employment, Entrepreneurship and Innovation · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team, so everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Customised Approval Checklist
Generates a list of required registrations and permissions based on sector, location, and project size.
Document Pre-Validation
Guides applicants through paperwork and checks submissions before they go to departments.
Departmental Workflow Coordinator
Manages parallel reviews, schedules inspections, and tracks service-level timelines across authorities.
Unified Dashboard
Provides a single view for applicants and officials to monitor applications, renewals, and incentives.
Regulatory Knowledge Engine
Powers the system with compliance rules, risk-based scrutiny, and analytics for identifying bottlenecks.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The evaluators will check if your system can actually generate tailored checklists, pre-validate documents, coordinate multiple department workflows, and track timelines on a single dashboard.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules, never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
Which specific departments and legacy government databases need to be integrated?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
What the exact compliance rules and checklists are for each sector?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
The brief asks for customised approval checklist. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26130 itself: Generates a list of required registrations and permissions based on sector, location, and project size. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for document pre-validation. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26130 itself: Guides applicants through paperwork and checks submissions before they go to departments. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for departmental workflow coordinator. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26130 itself: Manages parallel reviews, schedules inspections, and tracks service-level timelines across authorities. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for unified dashboard. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26130 itself: Provides a single view for applicants and officials to monitor applications, renewals, and incentives. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for regulatory knowledge engine. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26130 itself: Powers the system with compliance rules, risk-based scrutiny, and analytics for identifying bottlenecks. The brief asks for it by name.
Where does your data come from: a published source, one you collect, or one you generate?
No dataset is attached to this problem statement, so sourcing it is part of the work and nobody told you that.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the evaluators will check if your system can actually generate tailored checklists, pre-validate documents, coordinate multiple department workflows, and track timelines on a single dashboard.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.