A cloud-based clinical trial management dashboard that helps AIIA track Ayurveda studies, monitor safety events, and manage regulatory compliance in real time.
Ministry of Ayush · All India Institute of Ayurveda · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team, so everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Portfolio Tracking & KPIs
Tracks study lifecycle milestones, recruitment targets, and generates alerts for enrolment lags or overdue visits.
Role-Based Access Control
Provides tailored views and permissions for investigators, study coordinators, monitors, ethics committees, and regulators.
Pharmacovigilance Module
Captures and routes adverse event reports against regulatory timelines with standard drug coding dictionaries.
Interoperability & CDISC Models
Implements data models aligned with CDISC standards and HL7 FHIR R4 for integration with electronic data capture and hospital systems.
Audit Trail & Privacy Controls
Maintains an immutable, time-stamped audit trail meeting ALCOA+ data integrity rules alongside informed consent management.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The jury will check data accuracy and integrity, timeliness of safety and regulatory reporting, interoperability conformance with FHIR and CDISC standards, and the completeness of access controls and the audit trail.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules, never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
Exact database schema or templates for Ayurveda-specific clinical parameters?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Specific cloud provider credentials or hosting budget provided to students?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
The brief asks for portfolio tracking & kpis. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26046 itself: Tracks study lifecycle milestones, recruitment targets, and generates alerts for enrolment lags or overdue visits. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for role-based access control. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26046 itself: Provides tailored views and permissions for investigators, study coordinators, monitors, ethics committees, and regulators. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for pharmacovigilance module. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26046 itself: Captures and routes adverse event reports against regulatory timelines with standard drug coding dictionaries. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for interoperability & cdisc models. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26046 itself: Implements data models aligned with CDISC standards and HL7 FHIR R4 for integration with electronic data capture and hospital systems. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for audit trail & privacy controls. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26046 itself: Maintains an immutable, time-stamped audit trail meeting ALCOA+ data integrity rules alongside informed consent management. The brief asks for it by name.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the jury will check data accuracy and integrity, timeliness of safety and regulatory reporting, interoperability conformance with FHIR and CDISC standards, and the completeness of access controls and the audit trail.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.