A blockchain-based web platform that manages decentralized user identities, role-based access control, and NFT-based digital asset ownership for administrators and users.
Bharat Electronics Limited · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team — everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Decentralized Identity Module
Creates and authenticates user identities using decentralized identifiers and cryptographic proofs.
Role-Based Access Control
Enforces user roles and access permissions automatically through smart contracts.
NFT Asset Management
Mints, allocates, and transfers digital assets represented as non-fungible tokens on the blockchain.
Smart Contract Governance
Governs platform rules to allow only authorized administrators to mint and distribute assets.
Audit Trail Log
Records all identity, asset, and access control transactions immutably for verification.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The jury will check whether smart contracts correctly enforce role-based access control and whether all actions like identity creation, NFT allocation, and permission updates are immutably recorded.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules — never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
Which specific blockchain network or framework should be used?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
What specific user interface or frontend technology is expected?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
How user login and cryptographic key management are handled in the browser?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.
Pick what you are about to do and copy the prompt. It carries the organisers' own wording, the constraints they never spell out, and an instruction not to invent requirements they never set.
Who has this problem, what already exists, and what you would have to find out.
The brief asks for decentralized identity module. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26125 itself — Creates and authenticates user identities using decentralized identifiers and cryptographic proofs. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for role-based access control. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26125 itself — Enforces user roles and access permissions automatically through smart contracts. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for nft asset management. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26125 itself — Mints, allocates, and transfers digital assets represented as non-fungible tokens on the blockchain. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for smart contract governance. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26125 itself — Governs platform rules to allow only authorized administrators to mint and distribute assets. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for audit trail log. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26125 itself — Records all identity, asset, and access control transactions immutably for verification. The brief asks for it by name.
Where does your data come from — a published source, one you collect, or one you generate?
No dataset is attached to this problem statement, so sourcing it is part of the work and nobody told you that.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the jury will check whether smart contracts correctly enforce role-based access control and whether all actions like identity creation, NFT allocation, and permission updates are immutably recorded.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.