A CAD model built in Autodesk Fusion of a warehouse robot base and one working tool attachment, designed for 3D printing.
Autodesk · Autodesk Education Experience · Hardware
Signing in saves it for your whole team, so everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Universal AMR Base
Design a robot chassis concept using Autodesk Fusion that supports multiple attachments and handles structural integrity and weight reduction.
Modular Attachment
Design one specific warehouse task attachment, such as bin handling or inventory scanning, that connects to the robot base.
Generative Optimization
Use Fusion features like generative design, topology optimization, and simulation to improve efficiency and material usage.
Presentation and Renders
Prepare a 5 to 7 slide PowerPoint presentation along with rendered images and public Fusion links.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The evaluators will check that you used Autodesk Fusion exclusively for your designs and that you submit a public link to your model. They will also inspect your PowerPoint presentation and, for the grand finale, examine your physical 3D printed scaled components.
Nothing we looked for and failed to find.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules, never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
The brief asks for universal amr base. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26112 itself: Design a robot chassis concept using Autodesk Fusion that supports multiple attachments and handles structural integrity and weight reduction. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for modular attachment. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26112 itself: Design one specific warehouse task attachment, such as bin handling or inventory scanning, that connects to the robot base. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for generative optimization. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26112 itself: Use Fusion features like generative design, topology optimization, and simulation to improve efficiency and material usage. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for presentation and renders. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26112 itself: Prepare a 5 to 7 slide PowerPoint presentation along with rendered images and public Fusion links. The brief asks for it by name.
Where does your data come from: a published source, one you collect, or one you generate?
No dataset is attached to this problem statement, so sourcing it is part of the work and nobody told you that.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the evaluators will check that you used Autodesk Fusion exclusively for your designs and that you submit a public link to your model.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.
Show me this working: they will also inspect your PowerPoint presentation and, for the grand finale, examine your physical 3D printed scaled components.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.
Each one is quoted from a gap in the brief, not a guess about your team.
Needs physical hardware
Listed as a hardware problem statement, so a working demo needs physical components you have to source yourself.
No measurable target
The description requires payload capacity and efficiency considerations, but it never states a specific numerical target for weight, payload, or performance.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.