A web platform that uses AI to verify bidder documents against government databases and generates a compliance score for procurement officers.
Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas · Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited(CPCL) · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team — everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Portal Integration
Connects with external government databases like GSTN, PAN, and Udyam to pull bidder data.
Document Extractor
Extracts text and validates uploaded documents such as certificates and tax filings.
AI Verification Engine
Compares document data against portal data to flag missing or inconsistent information.
Scoring and Recommendations
Calculates an overall compliance score and risk level with recommendations for the officer.
Compliance Dashboard
Displays the verification status, risk level, and audit logs for the procurement officer.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The evaluators will check if the platform successfully integrates with the listed government portals and databases, accurately extracts data from uploaded documents, and generates a reliable compliance score and audit trail.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules — never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
Which specific APIs or credentials will be provided for government portal integration?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
The exact algorithm or formula for calculating the compliance score and risk level?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
The expected format for tender-specific compliance rules?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
Each one is quoted from a gap in the brief, not a guess about your team.
Needs data you may not get
The solution requires integration with live government portals and databases like GeM, GSTN, and MCA21 which are not publicly accessible via simple developer APIs for students.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.
Pick what you are about to do and copy the prompt. It carries the organisers' own wording, the constraints they never spell out, and an instruction not to invent requirements they never set.
Who has this problem, what already exists, and what you would have to find out.
The brief asks for portal integration. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26100 itself — Connects with external government databases like GSTN, PAN, and Udyam to pull bidder data. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for document extractor. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26100 itself — Extracts text and validates uploaded documents such as certificates and tax filings. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for ai verification engine. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26100 itself — Compares document data against portal data to flag missing or inconsistent information. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for scoring and recommendations. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26100 itself — Calculates an overall compliance score and risk level with recommendations for the officer. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for compliance dashboard. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26100 itself — Displays the verification status, risk level, and audit logs for the procurement officer. The brief asks for it by name.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the evaluators will check if the platform successfully integrates with the listed government portals and databases, accurately extracts data from uploaded documents, and generates a reliable compliance score and audit trail.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.