A web and mobile platform that lets training institutes manage cooperative courses, track attendance, and connect rural youth with employers and learning resources.
Ministry of Cooperation · National Council for Cooperative Training (NCCT) · Hardware
Signing in saves it for your whole team — everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
ERP Training Management
Handles online programme registration, nominations, timetables, and hostel logistics.
Multilingual E-Learning LMS
Provides interactive learning modules with assessments, certifications, and offline access.
Digital Attendance System
Captures attendance using face recognition or QR code technology.
Skill Repository and Chatbot
Stores verifiable skill certificates and includes a career counseling chatbot.
Employer Dashboard and Exchange
Connects trained youth with recruiters through a dedicated dashboard.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The evaluators will check if the platform integrates ERP management, multilingual e-learning, face recognition or QR attendance, and an employment exchange into a single mobile-friendly and offline-accessible system.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules — never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
Which languages must be supported for the multilingual features?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Specific cloud infrastructure or hosting requirements?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Integration details for existing institutional databases?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
Each one is quoted from a gap in the brief, not a guess about your team.
Needs physical hardware
Listed as a hardware problem statement, so a working demo needs physical components you have to source yourself.
No measurable target
The text lists many required features but provides no measurable targets for performance, accuracy, or user adoption.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.
Pick what you are about to do and copy the prompt. It carries the organisers' own wording, the constraints they never spell out, and an instruction not to invent requirements they never set.
Who has this problem, what already exists, and what you would have to find out.
The brief asks for erp training management. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26087 itself — Handles online programme registration, nominations, timetables, and hostel logistics. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for multilingual e-learning lms. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26087 itself — Provides interactive learning modules with assessments, certifications, and offline access. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for digital attendance system. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26087 itself — Captures attendance using face recognition or QR code technology. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for skill repository and chatbot. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26087 itself — Stores verifiable skill certificates and includes a career counseling chatbot. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for employer dashboard and exchange. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26087 itself — Connects trained youth with recruiters through a dedicated dashboard. The brief asks for it by name.
Where does your data come from — a published source, one you collect, or one you generate?
No dataset is attached to this problem statement, so sourcing it is part of the work and nobody told you that.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the evaluators will check if the platform integrates ERP management, multilingual e-learning, face recognition or QR attendance, and an employment exchange into a single mobile-friendly and offline-accessible system.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.