A MATLAB and Simulink simulation that tests an autonomous vehicle navigating unstructured Indian roads with mixed traffic, unexpected obstacles, and missing lane markings.
MathWorks · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team — everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Simulation Pipeline
A working model in MATLAB and Simulink that integrates perception, prediction, path planning, decision logic, and vehicle motion.
Scenario Design
Driving scenarios created using RoadRunner that represent Indian road conditions, including village roads and urban intersections.
Perception and Prediction
Components to identify diverse road users and predict the short-term motion of irregular movement patterns.
Path Planning and Control
A system using Navigation Toolbox and Stateflow that generates safe, collision-free paths and replans in real time.
Results and Documentation
Performance metrics such as replanning latency, path smoothness, and scenario completion rate, along with a technical report and demonstration video.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
Evaluators will check if you tested your solution across all five required scenarios, used the suggested MathWorks tools, and provided specific metrics like replanning latency, path smoothness, and scenario completion rate.
Nothing we looked for and failed to find.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules — never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
The brief asks for simulation pipeline. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26037 itself — A working model in MATLAB and Simulink that integrates perception, prediction, path planning, decision logic, and vehicle motion. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for scenario design. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26037 itself — Driving scenarios created using RoadRunner that represent Indian road conditions, including village roads and urban intersections. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for perception and prediction. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26037 itself — Components to identify diverse road users and predict the short-term motion of irregular movement patterns. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for path planning and control. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26037 itself — A system using Navigation Toolbox and Stateflow that generates safe, collision-free paths and replans in real time. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for results and documentation. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26037 itself — Performance metrics such as replanning latency, path smoothness, and scenario completion rate, along with a technical report and demonstration video. The brief asks for it by name.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: evaluators will check if you tested your solution across all five required scenarios, used the suggested MathWorks tools, and provided specific metrics like replanning latency, path smoothness, and scenario completion rate.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.
Pick what you are about to do and copy the prompt. It carries the organisers' own wording, the constraints they never spell out, and an instruction not to invent requirements they never set.
Who has this problem, what already exists, and what you would have to find out.