A web or desktop application that lets testing laboratories record weighing instrument observations, calculate errors against OIML R 76 rules, and generate standardized digital test reports.
Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution · Department of Consumer Affairs (DoCA) · Software
Signing in saves it for your whole team — everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Instrument Details Entry
Forms to capture manufacturer details, instrument specifications, model information, and technical parameters.
Test Data Recording
Digital entry forms for laboratory conditions and observations from prescribed OIML R 76 test procedures.
Automated Calculation Engine
Automatic calculation of permissible errors, validation of input data, and determination of pass or fail compliance status.
Report Generation
Automatic creation of standardized digital test reports exported to PDF and editable formats like MS Word.
Report Repository and Dashboard
A secure dashboard for managing test workflows, viewing instrument-wise history, and searching past reports.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The jury will check whether your application correctly automates calculations and determines pass or fail compliance as per OIML R 76 standards, and whether it generates accurate standardized test reports in PDF and editable formats.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules — never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
The exact list and mathematical formulas for all OIML R 76 test procedures required.?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
The specific user roles needed for role-based permissions.?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
The brief asks for instrument details entry. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26035 itself — Forms to capture manufacturer details, instrument specifications, model information, and technical parameters. The brief asks for it by name.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.
Pick what you are about to do and copy the prompt. It carries the organisers' own wording, the constraints they never spell out, and an instruction not to invent requirements they never set.
Who has this problem, what already exists, and what you would have to find out.
The brief asks for test data recording. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26035 itself — Digital entry forms for laboratory conditions and observations from prescribed OIML R 76 test procedures. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for automated calculation engine. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26035 itself — Automatic calculation of permissible errors, validation of input data, and determination of pass or fail compliance status. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for report generation. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26035 itself — Automatic creation of standardized digital test reports exported to PDF and editable formats like MS Word. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for report repository and dashboard. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26035 itself — A secure dashboard for managing test workflows, viewing instrument-wise history, and searching past reports. The brief asks for it by name.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the jury will check whether your application correctly automates calculations and determines pass or fail compliance as per OIML R 76 standards, and whether it generates accurate standardized test reports in PDF and editable formats.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.