A hardware device and packaging system that rural women artisans can use to solar-dry and pack agarbatti evenly at home.
Ministry of MSME · Coordination Section · Hardware
Signing in saves it for your whole team — everyone on your invite link sees the same two entries. Anything you shortlisted while signed out comes with you.
Decomposed from what the description asks for. Nothing added.
Solar Drying Chamber
An enclosed chamber powered by solar energy with battery backup for all-weather drying.
Sensor and Control Unit
Temperature and humidity sensors that maintain proper conditions inside the drying chamber.
Airflow Mechanism
A system that ensures uniform airflow throughout the chamber for even drying.
Packaging and Sealing Tool
A low-cost, compact sealing device that preserves fragrance and resists moisture.
Both columns are read off the brief's own wording. Nothing here is inferred from the ministry's name.
The evaluators will check if the system is low-cost, portable, easy to operate for women artisans, and capable of preserving fragrance while resisting moisture.
A jury can still ask about these. Decide them deliberately rather than by accident.
Generated from the brief's own wording and the competition's published rules — never from a guess about what this ministry prefers.
What dimensions or capacity the drying chamber must have?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
What specific budget constitutes low cost?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
What temperature and humidity ranges are optimal for agarbatti drying?
The brief never answers this, so a panel will. Whatever you decide, say it the same way twice.
Has any part of this been shown at a previous event, hackathon or college project?
The guidelines are explicit: your solution must not have appeared in any previous event or programme, of any sort. A recycled project is what a team under time pressure reaches for.
Each one is quoted from a gap in the brief, not a guess about your team.
Needs physical hardware
Listed as a hardware problem statement, so a working demo needs physical components you have to source yourself.
No measurable target
The text calls for a low-cost system and improved shelf life without defining specific numerical targets for cost or drying time.
What the organisers attached, and what the brief assumes you can get.
Same organisation, same year. Reading two of theirs tells you more about what they care about than reading one.
Pick what you are about to do and copy the prompt. It carries the organisers' own wording, the constraints they never spell out, and an instruction not to invent requirements they never set.
Who has this problem, what already exists, and what you would have to find out.
The brief asks for solar drying chamber. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26022 itself — An enclosed chamber powered by solar energy with battery backup for all-weather drying. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for sensor and control unit. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26022 itself — Temperature and humidity sensors that maintain proper conditions inside the drying chamber. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for airflow mechanism. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26022 itself — A system that ensures uniform airflow throughout the chamber for even drying. The brief asks for it by name.
The brief asks for packaging and sealing tool. How would you build that?
Decoded from SIH26022 itself — A low-cost, compact sealing device that preserves fragrance and resists moisture. The brief asks for it by name.
Where does your data come from — a published source, one you collect, or one you generate?
No dataset is attached to this problem statement, so sourcing it is part of the work and nobody told you that.
Why not use what already exists? Name the closest thing to this that is already running.
A team that has not named the alternative themselves is answering this for the first time in the room.
Which single thing will you demonstrate end to end, start to finish, with nothing skipped?
Ours, not a rule: a narrow thing that fully works survives questioning better than a broad thing that half works. If nobody on the team can name it, that is the finding.
Show me this working: the evaluators will check if the system is low-cost, portable, easy to operate for women artisans, and capable of preserving fragrance while resisting moisture.
This is the evaluator read for your problem statement, decoded from the brief's own wording.